Category Archives: Red Ramblings

Rants, observations and general commentary about life not involving usability.

Google says book scanning didn’t cost authors a single sale

Not sure how I feel on this one. The idea that it won’t cost authors any sales seems ludicrous, but being able to do a search and find passages from any number of books sounds VERY useful. What I really want to know is: Where was this tool when I was in high school?

Jeff John Roberts's avatarGigaom

Google (s goog) cites everything from Mad Men to minority rights in a fresh attempt to bolster its claim that the scanning of millions of books qualifies as a “fair use” under copyright law. The arguments, set out in court filings submitted on Friday, come as Google’s long-running dispute with the Authors Guild heads toward an end game.

According to Google, its massive book scanning project is fair use because the scanning has delivered many public benefits without harming authors. The company claims that its creation of full-text book searching is “the most significant advance in library search technology in the last five decades” and that the Authors Guild has shown “no evidence that Google Books has displaced the sale of even a single book.”

The new filing (embedded below) is in response to Judge Denny Chin’s deadline for Google and the Authors Guild to submit arguments on why the case can be…

View original post 451 more words

Hallelujah, Christians get their own e-reader

I’m not the audience for this device, but I did find the quote “It’s been rewarding to tell my friends and family that I have a Christ-centered tablet” strangely amusing.

Clever marketing… take a Nook, slap a Bible app on it, install Net Nanny, call it Christian. Rake in the cash.

Laura Hazard Owen's avatarGigaom

You may not be the audience for Family Christian Stores’ new color-screen e-reader, the edifi. But with religious ebook sales surging, the chain hopes that special religious features will entice shoppers to choose its device over others.

Family Christian Stores, which has nearly 300 locations throughout the U.S. and calls itself the country’s leading provider of Christian books and supplies, just launched the color-screen Android edifi for $149.99. It’s available online and in Family Christian stores. The company also offers a free Family Christian Reader app for iOS (s AAPL) and Android (s GOOG).

Like a low-end version of Barnes & Noble’s $169 Nook (s BKS) Color, the edify is essentially a 7-inch WiFi e-reader with some tablet functions. It’s preloaded with a Family Christian Reader app and includes a “suite of family-friendly features” including safe-search Web browsing, Christian radio and English Bible translations. It has a touchscreen…

View original post 62 more words

Kiosks keep rolling: Redbox reports 26% Q2 revenue increase

OK, I’ll admit that this is pretty surprising. I never believed those ads, but apparently I was wrong.

Daniel Frankel's avatarGigaom

You know those direct response ads on TV encouraging viewers to go into the DVD kiosk business? Well, as Coinstar (s CSTR), parent company of Redbox, will tell you, it’s still not a bad little business.

On Thursday, Coinstar reported second-quarter revenue growth of 22 percent to $532.2 million and profit of $26.7 million, driven by a 26 percent income spike to $458 million by its Redbox DVD kiosk business.

Also read:Verizon/Redbox video service has name and exec team, begins testing

No new information about Redbox’s joint venture with Verizon was given during Thursday’s earnings call with investors.

During the second quarter, Redbox closed its purchase of rival kiosk operator NCR and also launched into Canada.

According to Coinstar, the kiosk operator’s U.S. share of the DVD and Blu-ray rental market — where it operates 38,500 kiosks — has reached 42.5 percent, up 8 percent year over year.

View original post

Real Men

First, a link: http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/25/opinion/bennett-aurora-three/index.html?hpt=hp_c1

Three men were sitting in that Aurora movie theater with their girlfriends when a mad man opened fire. Without thinking, all three leaped to put themselves between the shooter and a woman to which they had no legal or familial obligation, dying in the process. Three men, all in their twenties, sacrificed themselves without a moments hesitation.

It’s easy to understand a man risking himself for his family. Ask any father about protecting his wife and kids and you’ll see a look in his eyes more eloquent than anything he can say. It simply says “No. Nothing will hurt them.”

It’s also understood that an adult will put himself (or herself) at risk to protect a child, regardless of whether or not it’s theirs or if they even know the kid. Stories of people unhesitatingly putting their lives in danger, and sometimes losing them, in order to save a child they had never laid eyes on a minute before are not unusual. I remember one story where a child fell into a raging river and THREE adults died saving her, none of them family. Scientist say the human animal has an instinctive hard coding that makes us protect the young because it’s what keeps the species alive.

But why did three adult men unhesitatingly throw their lives away to protect these adult women? It wasn’t to score points with them, that’s for sure. They didn’t have time to think “Wow, if I protect her now she’ll REALLY like me.”

Chivalry maybe? When the girls agreed to go out on the date with them, the men decided that they had some sacred obligation to defend them- laying down their lives if needed. I think this strikes closer to the truth… but doesn’t quite hit it.

Imagine a scene where any of these guys went to the movie alone and happened to be sitting next to a girl who was also at the movie alone:
Him: “Hi. My friends think I’m such a geek for coming here alone for a midnight showing of a Batman movie.”
Her: “Yeah, mine too.”

Does ANYBODY doubt that, as soon as the bullets started flying that, based on that little exchange, any one of these guys would have done everything he could to protect this girl who was there alone… unprotected? Of course he would.

Why? Because they were REAL men. It’s that simple. All of us that pee standing up secretly hope that, when push comes to shove, we will be real men and won’t collapse in a weeping pile of cowardice. We all secretly fear that, deep down, we won’t have it in us to do “the right thing”. That we won’t pass the test.

Jon Blunk, Alex Teves and Matt McQuinn took the test and passed it.

Heading to the Olympics? Leave that personal hotspot behind

I understand the reasoning for this, both from a technological and financial stand point. But…wouldn’t this be almost unenforceable if they are allowing iPhones in? I have an app on my iPhone 4 that turns it into a portable hot-spot.

Robert Andrews's avatarGigaom

Don’t take a gun, a knife, a vuvuzela or a wireless network to London 2012.

WiFi and 3G base stations are on the list of items spectators are prohibited from taking in to Olympic venues. But BT will be charging attendees to access its own airspace…

According to the list:

“Personal/private wireless access points and 3G hubs (smart devices such as Android phones, iPhone and tablets are permitted inside venues, but must not be used as wireless access points to connect multiple devices).”

The London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games (LOCOG) hasn’t yet responded to our querying the reason for the ban.

Whilst, to some, it may seem silly, there is probably a perfectly logical explanation. Just as the London games’ organising committee has tried to have mobile phone carriers ensure quality coverage in and around Olympic venues, so, too, it wants to ensure crisp WiFi signals without interference.

But there may be another…

View original post 303 more words

10 Classic Toys That Deserve a Second Life

Teddy Ruxpin always creeped me out as a kid, so not so sure about that one.

However, “Jem and the Holograms” was a HUGE hit when I was in college in the late 80’s. I’ll never forget the sight of 20 college students gathered around a TV screen at 9AM watching Jem and threatening death on any new student that tried to change the channel.

PSU

I’m not a Penn State fan and never have been. Grew up in Florida so Penn State and JoePa were never a factor in my sports life.

However, if I was a PSU grad I think I’d have preferred to have a 1-2 year “death penalty” compared to what they got today. Competitively, I’m reading that Penn State won’t be back to form until 2020 at the earliest. That means that if Romney wins in November he could serve TWO full terms and PSU will still be on par with North East Tennessee Tech as far as football goes.

Compared to that, the idea of going dark for a year or two doesn’t seem so bad.

OK.. back to work.