Author Archives: Atlanta B.A.

Kiosks keep rolling: Redbox reports 26% Q2 revenue increase

OK, I’ll admit that this is pretty surprising. I never believed those ads, but apparently I was wrong.

Daniel Frankel's avatarGigaom

You know those direct response ads on TV encouraging viewers to go into the DVD kiosk business? Well, as Coinstar (s CSTR), parent company of Redbox, will tell you, it’s still not a bad little business.

On Thursday, Coinstar reported second-quarter revenue growth of 22 percent to $532.2 million and profit of $26.7 million, driven by a 26 percent income spike to $458 million by its Redbox DVD kiosk business.

Also read:Verizon/Redbox video service has name and exec team, begins testing

No new information about Redbox’s joint venture with Verizon was given during Thursday’s earnings call with investors.

During the second quarter, Redbox closed its purchase of rival kiosk operator NCR and also launched into Canada.

According to Coinstar, the kiosk operator’s U.S. share of the DVD and Blu-ray rental market — where it operates 38,500 kiosks — has reached 42.5 percent, up 8 percent year over year.

View original post

Real Men

First, a link: http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/25/opinion/bennett-aurora-three/index.html?hpt=hp_c1

Three men were sitting in that Aurora movie theater with their girlfriends when a mad man opened fire. Without thinking, all three leaped to put themselves between the shooter and a woman to which they had no legal or familial obligation, dying in the process. Three men, all in their twenties, sacrificed themselves without a moments hesitation.

It’s easy to understand a man risking himself for his family. Ask any father about protecting his wife and kids and you’ll see a look in his eyes more eloquent than anything he can say. It simply says “No. Nothing will hurt them.”

It’s also understood that an adult will put himself (or herself) at risk to protect a child, regardless of whether or not it’s theirs or if they even know the kid. Stories of people unhesitatingly putting their lives in danger, and sometimes losing them, in order to save a child they had never laid eyes on a minute before are not unusual. I remember one story where a child fell into a raging river and THREE adults died saving her, none of them family. Scientist say the human animal has an instinctive hard coding that makes us protect the young because it’s what keeps the species alive.

But why did three adult men unhesitatingly throw their lives away to protect these adult women? It wasn’t to score points with them, that’s for sure. They didn’t have time to think “Wow, if I protect her now she’ll REALLY like me.”

Chivalry maybe? When the girls agreed to go out on the date with them, the men decided that they had some sacred obligation to defend them- laying down their lives if needed. I think this strikes closer to the truth… but doesn’t quite hit it.

Imagine a scene where any of these guys went to the movie alone and happened to be sitting next to a girl who was also at the movie alone:
Him: “Hi. My friends think I’m such a geek for coming here alone for a midnight showing of a Batman movie.”
Her: “Yeah, mine too.”

Does ANYBODY doubt that, as soon as the bullets started flying that, based on that little exchange, any one of these guys would have done everything he could to protect this girl who was there alone… unprotected? Of course he would.

Why? Because they were REAL men. It’s that simple. All of us that pee standing up secretly hope that, when push comes to shove, we will be real men and won’t collapse in a weeping pile of cowardice. We all secretly fear that, deep down, we won’t have it in us to do “the right thing”. That we won’t pass the test.

Jon Blunk, Alex Teves and Matt McQuinn took the test and passed it.

Heading to the Olympics? Leave that personal hotspot behind

I understand the reasoning for this, both from a technological and financial stand point. But…wouldn’t this be almost unenforceable if they are allowing iPhones in? I have an app on my iPhone 4 that turns it into a portable hot-spot.

Robert Andrews's avatarGigaom

Don’t take a gun, a knife, a vuvuzela or a wireless network to London 2012.

WiFi and 3G base stations are on the list of items spectators are prohibited from taking in to Olympic venues. But BT will be charging attendees to access its own airspace…

According to the list:

“Personal/private wireless access points and 3G hubs (smart devices such as Android phones, iPhone and tablets are permitted inside venues, but must not be used as wireless access points to connect multiple devices).”

The London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games (LOCOG) hasn’t yet responded to our querying the reason for the ban.

Whilst, to some, it may seem silly, there is probably a perfectly logical explanation. Just as the London games’ organising committee has tried to have mobile phone carriers ensure quality coverage in and around Olympic venues, so, too, it wants to ensure crisp WiFi signals without interference.

But there may be another…

View original post 303 more words

10 Classic Toys That Deserve a Second Life

Teddy Ruxpin always creeped me out as a kid, so not so sure about that one.

However, “Jem and the Holograms” was a HUGE hit when I was in college in the late 80’s. I’ll never forget the sight of 20 college students gathered around a TV screen at 9AM watching Jem and threatening death on any new student that tried to change the channel.

A railroad makes it hard for me to go home.

My full-time job is in the transportation industry, in particular rail services.

Today I was searching for tariffs on the Union Pacific site- see below:

I searched for a tariff rate using the little search field on the upper right. No results. So I hit what I thought was the “Home” link… but is actually the “Search Home” link. All that happens was the screen refreshed, leaving me stuck on the same page:

How do I get off this screen? The “shield” logo doesn’t work as a “Home” button and the navigation on the home page has vanished. It took me a full minute or two to finally notice the tiny little nav bar on the bottom.

Note to web developers… never make it hard for me to get back “Home”.

I expected better from Steam

This is one of those cases where I’m so shocked at how stupid something is that I have to double-check to make sure that I’m right before I post it here. I really couldn’t believe I was right, but unfortunately I was.

Recently, I bought a new game on Valve’s Steam service. It won’t load for me, even though I’ve installed and reinstalled it twice now. So I try to send an email to Steam support.

This is the screen that I got. Click it for a better view…

Apparently, you need to have a COMPLETELY SEPARATE ID and password for Steam Support. WHAT? I need a Steam account and a separate Steam Support account??

It’s clear that even Steam realizes this is a bizarrely stupid idea because their little cartoon has “unique account” in a different color with a little hand pointing to it AND a “Pro Tip” telling you: “Yes, we really are telling you that you need a separate account for help on an ONLINE GAMING PLATFORM!”

I love the little black cat. A character in their own cartoon is saying “Why bother?” in disgust and before you ask, NO the cat is not a link to a page giving a valid reason for this idiocy.

Steam, why would you do something this stupid? The only reason you exist is online gamers. Why would you do something that is guaranteed to frustrate your ONLY consumers?

PSU

I’m not a Penn State fan and never have been. Grew up in Florida so Penn State and JoePa were never a factor in my sports life.

However, if I was a PSU grad I think I’d have preferred to have a 1-2 year “death penalty” compared to what they got today. Competitively, I’m reading that Penn State won’t be back to form until 2020 at the earliest. That means that if Romney wins in November he could serve TWO full terms and PSU will still be on par with North East Tennessee Tech as far as football goes.

Compared to that, the idea of going dark for a year or two doesn’t seem so bad.

OK.. back to work.